SCOTUS Patent Cert Denials: Focus on Process, Not Doctrine
Patently-O reports that SCOTUS denied 36 patent petitions over the past year, granting only one. The high number of procedural denials highlights that litigation battles are fought on mechanics rather than substantive patent law.
WISECODE Take
Many business owners mistakenly believe that the key to winning US patent litigation lies in substantive laws, but recent data reveals a different reality. According to Patently-O on August 26, 2026, SCOTUS denied 36 patent petitions over the past year, granting only the Hikma case, with procedural issues like IPR leading the denials at 7 cases. This shows litigation battles are fought on mechanics rather than substantive patent law. Unless currently litigating in the US, these denials have zero impact on your daily operations. For those with US portfolios, Intellectual Classic's patent portfolio health check helps eliminate procedural flaws at the filing stage. We suggest: first, demand strict specification reviews from patent attorneys to prevent technical loopholes in future IPRs; second, if not in litigation, focus on core R&D instead of overreacting to SCOTUS fluctuations. Most patent battles are decided at filing; procedural rules are just the referee's whistle ending the game.
Original sources
Compiled automatically by WISECODE IP Radar. Summaries are short source excerpts; commentary is AI-generated. See the source links for full text.
How does this affect your company?
WISECODE assesses IP risk and helps you decide what the news means for your next step.