Agfa loses major claims of leather printing patent to Gucci at UPC Court of Appeal
The UPC Court of Appeal partially revoked Agfa's EP 3 388 490 patent, holding that a manufacturing method can be invalidated under Article 54(2) EPC if skilled persons can reverse-engineer it from a publicly available product like Gucci's Flora wallet.
WISECODE Take
The UPC Court of Appeal ruled in favor of Gucci in case UPC_CoA_582/2025, revoking most claims of Agfa's leather printing patent EP 3 388 490. Many assume unwritten manufacturing processes remain secret, but the court held that any method reproducible by analyzing a market product loses novelty. Presided over by Court President Klaus Grabinski, the panel considered Gucci's Flora wallet sold before April 2017. Under Article 54(2) EPC, the court ruled that skilled persons could analyze base coat compositions without undue burden, making the publicly sold product prior art. This confirms that relying on public goods while keeping processes confidential fails as a patent strategy in Europe. Businesses whose products cannot be reverse-engineered remain unaffected. IP Knowledge offers patent portfolio checkups to clarify boundaries before launch. Companies should take two actions. First, assess reverse-engineering risks before releasing samples. Second, if a process can be analyzed from the product, protect it as a trade secret rather than filing a patent. The analytical reverse-engineering of commercial goods is a sharp weapon often overlooked in patent defense.
Original sources
Compiled automatically by WISECODE IP Radar. Summaries are short source excerpts; commentary is AI-generated. See the source links for full text.
How does this affect your company?
WISECODE assesses IP risk and helps you decide what the news means for your next step.