French Court Invalidates Insulet Patent Claims, Dismissing Over €3M Claim Against Medtrum
The Judicial Court of Paris invalidated key claims of Insulet's EP 2 438 957 patent, rejecting its €3 million infringement damages request against Medtrum and ordering Insulet to pay €50,000 in advance compensation for damages caused by a prior preliminary injunction.
WISECODE Take
Many companies assume that obtaining a preliminary injunction secures market victory, but it is essentially a leveraged operation carrying liability risks. On September 4, 2026, the Judicial Court of Paris invalidated claims of Insulet's European Patent EP 2 438 957 for lack of inventive step, rejecting over €3 million in damages claims against Medtrum and ordering Insulet to pay €50,000 as an advance payment for damages caused by the injunction. For exporting companies, initiating patent invalidation is crucial when facing litigation; businesses not operating in Europe remain unaffected. Chidian provides patent portfolio checkups to clarify stability and infringement risks prior to international expansion. Businesses facing overseas IP litigation should consider two steps: first, file invalidation actions against the asserting patent concurrently when sued; second, document all channel and sales losses incurred during injunctions for future cross-claims. Initiating patent litigation without confirming patent validity ultimately converts the temporary market restriction into self-inflicted financial liability.
Original sources
Compiled automatically by WISECODE IP Radar. Summaries are short source excerpts; commentary is AI-generated. See the source links for full text.
How does this affect your company?
WISECODE assesses IP risk and helps you decide what the news means for your next step.